Another injustice was committed against the Denver Broncos by the Pro Football Hall of Fame this week when the contributor committee selected Jerry Jones over Pat Bowlen. This has become commonplace for Broncos’ fans. A common occurrence that Broncos’ fans have become accustomed to and evermore angry about. The Pro Football Hall of Fame voters have repeatedly and with intent left out deserving Broncos for enshrinement in the hallowed halls of Canton. If you doubt this claim, below is irrefutable evidence proving that the Broncos are grossly underrepresented in a way that can only be described as purposeful.
Since the merger in 1970, the Broncos have had a tremendous amount of success. By looking at metrics such as wins, 10+ win seasons, Super Bowl appearances/victories, and the lack of 5 or less win seasons it is hard to argue that the Broncos are not in the top three of most successful NFL franchises since that time. Reference the chart below depicting this success. At the very least they are in the top five. If anyone tries to argue that point they are either lying or are a complete idiot. Or both.
|Since Merger (1970)|
|Rank||Team||Wins (including playoffs)||10+ Win Seasons||Super Bowl Wins||Super Bowl Appearances||Seasons with 5 wins or less||Score|
Since the Broncos organization has had so much success it would be reasonable to think that they have players, coaches, etc. enshrined in the hall of fame commensurate with that success. If this thought crossed your mind, you would be dead wrong. Below is a chart depicting the number of hall of fame inductees by team. Those numbers depict people who were with those teams a significant amount of time and who spent at least 4 seasons in the NFL after the merger so that we are comparing apples to apples.
How does a team that is top three in the NFL for success rank in the bottom half of the NFL for hall of fame inductees? There are eight teams ahead of them that aren’t even in the top 10 for success since the merger. One of them, the Kansas City Chiefs has only four playoff wins since 1970 compared to the Broncos 23. For a team to be successful they must have great coaching and great players, right? Therefore, those players/coaches should be recognized for their success? This is not the case when it comes to the Pro Football Hall of Fame and the Broncos.
Some may point to the New England Patriots and say they are also being discriminated against so it isn’t just the Broncos. By looking at the charts one could come to that conclusion however, the Patriots success is relatively recent. They became a consistently successful franchise around 1996 and many of their hall of fame worthy players/coaches are either still in the game, not yet eligible or just became eligible. That argument cannot be applied to the Broncos. They have played in Super Bowls in the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s, meaning they have fielded successful teams long enough to have players long eligible for the hall of fame.
Below is a chart representing the number of Hall of Fame inductees per win since the merger. The Broncos are clearly underrepresented.
|HOF inductees per win|
As a team, the Broncos are more than worthy to have significant representation in Canton. Let’s take a closer look at individual players by position. Have the Broncos fielded players with equivalent success to their counterparts on other teams who are already enshrined? As a matter of fact, they do.
The first player that comes to mind is Randy Gradishar. He had tremendous success in the league, but has not been enshrined while others at the same position, Willie Lanier, Ted Hendricks, Jack Lambert, Jack Hamm and Nick Buoniconti from the same era have long been inducted. How about Louis Wright? Again, there is Lem Barney, Mel Blount, Willie Brown, Mike Haynes and Emmitt Thomas. Karl Mecklenburg is another player. Harry Carson and Mike Singletary have been quickly ushered in, but Mekclenburg still waits. Steve Atwater you ask? Yep, yet another player passed over when Ronnie Lott is in from a similar era. Tom Nalen has barely gotten a sniff at the hall but, has as good or better production than other centers enshrined such as Dermontti Dawson, Mike Webster (yes, two from the Steelers) and Dwight Stephenson. Finally, and possibly the biggest omission on the list, Terrell Davis. He isn’t in, but Jerome Bettis (you guessed it, a Steeler), Curtis Martin, Marshall Faulk, Barry Sanders, Emmitt Smith and Thurman Thomas are.
If it were one or two players we were talking about here, I could understand, but what we have is a disturbing pattern. One that cannot be ignored. How does the saying go; once is chance, twice is coincidence, third time is a pattern? This blatant bias is appalling. Do the hall of fame voters understand the game of football? Yes, they are all qualified. Do they understand greatness? They must because they have enshrined some very deserving players over the years. This can be chalked up to only one thing; the individual bias of each member on the voting panel is being emphasized because there are so few voters. Forty-six members to be exact. It is a sheer numbers game. Many of the members either have a bias against the Broncos and/or towards other teams and by having so few votes cast, that bias is more pronounced. Those biases would not have nearly the effect with say 200 voters. There are two options, remove all current hall of fame voters and replace them with people who can objectively look at facts and vote accordingly or add a lot more qualified voters. Either way something must be done to rectify the situation.